Thin investigation involves possible violations of Washington wage and hour laws affecting current and former hourly or non-exempt employees.

The complaint claims Aramark:

• Failed to provide legally required meal and rest breaks,
• Did not pay required premium pay when those breaks were missed or interrupted, and
• Failed to pay overtime when total compensable work time exceeded 40 hours in a week.
  
  

The complaint also alleges that Seattle-based workers were subjected to last-minute schedule changes and canceled shifts without the predictability pay required by Seattle’s Secure Scheduling Ordinance.

We’re currently speaking with individuals who worked at the company to better understand their experiences and how widespread these issues may be. We’re also asking some people if they would be willing to provide a short legal declaration — that’s simply a written statement about your work experience that may be used in the case.

View the claim here. WRIGHTMAN VS ARAMARK

Read more about the case here: Matthew Wrightman has filed a proposed class action lawsuit against Aramark.

If you’d like to submit a declaration, please answer the questions below and we will reach out to you with next steps.